CoreWeave Systems

AI Agents & Assistants

Multi-Agent Workflow Orchestration

A scoped orchestration system with monitored handoffs, escalation, and failure recovery.

Enterprise

  1. Intake
  2. Check
  3. Review

Starting scope

Scoping starts with one process and defined agent responsibilities. The production system depends on access and risk.

Request a Quote

Request a Quote

What this service solves

Coordinate several AI-assisted stages of one process when they need different inputs, permissions, or owners. The orchestration defines what each role receives, where it hands off, and how a reviewer can see the current state or recover when an intermediate step fails.

What you get

Scoped orchestration

The agreed handoffs run with a clear job state, a bounded set of responsibilities, and an escalation route when one role cannot continue.

Recovery and observation

The team can distinguish a completed step from a pending review or failure and can identify the next action from the agreed monitoring information.

What’s included

  • Design roles and routing

    Map roles to authorized inputs and outputs. Define who receives work when a required artifact or decision is missing.

  • Define shared state and approval boundaries

    Identify the minimal shared state and the approval boundary for each transition. Record ownership and how to handle duplicate or late events.

  • Build and evaluate the agreed handoffs

    Build the agreed handoffs and exercise accepted, rejected, and interrupted work in the authorized environment.

How implementation works

  1. Scope and map roles

    Choose a process, map its dependencies, and agree on roles, interface constraints, and acceptance decisions.

  2. Prototype routing

    Prototype routing and state transitions with approved sample data, including a handoff a role cannot complete.

  3. Evaluate and roll out with controls

    Evaluate the proposed flow and review controls with its owner before any controlled rollout.

Technical considerations

State across handoffs
Carry the minimum work reference, current state, and reviewed output needed for the next stage. Agree on how to recognize a late or repeated event and what must be verified before an interrupted stage can resume.
Control and operating cost
Define the roles that need tools, the actions requiring approval, and the evaluation coverage before selecting infrastructure. Model calls, runtime services, and observability needs depend on the agreed actors, traffic, and assurance.

Systems, inputs & prerequisites

Business owner, interface documentation, approved environment and data, and acceptance rules.

  • The business owner, interface documentation, approved environment and data, and each role's access constraints.
  • Examples of complete, ambiguous, and interrupted work with the expected reviewer action at each approval boundary.

Starting scope & pricing

Fixed-Price Projects

Request a Quote

Request a Quote

Base scope

Scoping starts with one process and defined agent responsibilities. The production system depends on access and risk.

Illustrative workflow

An enterprise team wants to prepare an internal procurement request for review.
  1. Intake

    One role extracts the allowed request details from a submitted record.

  2. Check

    A second role compares the details to the approved checklist and flags missing evidence.

  3. Review

    The owner receives the request and the checklist status together before the next stage.

Validation & handover

  • Review the proposed role boundaries and one process state model with the business owner. Identify what each role may read, pass forward, and do.
  • Exercise an approved sample through the agreed handoffs and show where a human decision stops or permits the next stage.
  • Test a missing artifact and an interrupted handoff in the approved environment. Show what the operator can observe and how ownership is assigned before any controlled rollout.

Limitations & possible extras

Limitations

The engagement starts with scoping one process. Production work depends on the number of roles, access, volume, evaluation coverage, and assurance required. Infrastructure and model usage are separate considerations.

Pricing depends on tool access, number of actors, volume, and required assurance.

Possible extras

Infrastructure, metered model usage, evaluation, and extended assurance.

Questions about this service

When is a single workflow enough?

A rule-based workflow may be sufficient when every stage uses the same inputs, permissions, and predictable decisions. Use the process map to decide whether distinct agent roles make ownership or recovery clearer.

What if a stage finishes but its response arrives late?

Use the work reference and recorded stage status to check the observed result before resuming. If the state cannot be determined, escalate to the assigned owner.

Who decides whether an agent can use a new tool?

The business owner and the tool owner review the proposed access and action boundary. Additional capabilities require a scoped decision and relevant evaluation cases.

Can the engagement begin with a prototype of one handoff?

Yes. Scoping starts with one process and defined responsibilities. The production design depends on access, role count, volume, and the controls needed for the agreed handoffs.

Discuss this service

Multi-Agent Workflow Orchestration

Request a Quote